MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT
Section 5, Schedule and 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition for Maintenance Suit, for dissolution of marriage based on marriage and recovery of dowry articles, dissolution of marriage on the basis of marriage and articles of dowry To recover, the suit was. The petitioner's decision by the Family Court was that the Family Court had failed to grant him an e-mail grant and his respondent did not claim and asked for a Khola based order in his case. That he did not use the word "Khola". , But stated the facts in her claimant which was the reason for filing the claim The respondent lady stated that she had experienced severe hatred against the applicant. That there is no possibility of reconciliation between the parties and she prefers death rather than being in a marital union with the applicant. Respondents said the words could be interpreted as revealing Khola's plea. Words of Approval of the Khulla Decree ?? Section 14 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964, benefited from filing an appeal against the provisions of Rs 30,000 for the articles of dowry in which the lawmaker made this request. Was banned from taking advantage of by the applicant. In case of dowry articles up to Rs. 30,000, in a general case, extraordinary jurisdiction, extraordinary nature, the applicant cannot be granted constitutional application. Under the circumstances, dowry articles. There was no entertainment against the order of r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Barkhan lawyer