MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus NOOR AHMAD THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS
On the basis of the agreement for the specific performance of the specific performance of the contract 12 Act (Article 10, 1984), Article 129 (i) the specific performance of the contract, the defendants contend that the plaintiff did not meet the terms of the agreement. Selling within the stipulated period and failing to pay the balance and abandoning the said contract and returning the original sale contract to the seller, the trial court ruled in this case, but the appellate court overturned those findings. Which had a legal contract with the vendors. The plaintiff concealed the fact in the petitions and at the trial the plaintiff sought to rectify his case, presumably because the plaintiff had either abandoned the contract himself or had become worse in the matter. The appellate court's decision was pronounced. And the appeal was dismissed under circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
