Find a Lawyer

MST. NOOR JEHAN versus STATE

Section 2? (b) / 34 34 Definition of Evidence Three co-accused were acquitted on the basis of the evidence based on the evidence; the evidence of the witnesses cannot be ascertained against the accused. The extra-judicial confession, allegedly committed by the accused, was joint and the conduct of the two accused allegedly confessing was unnatural and the conduct of the prosecution witnesses, before whom the alleged confession was made, was the same. It was as they said that the witnesses left the house immediately. The judicial confession was denied because it was not credible and could not be used against the prosecution witness who had marked the feet, did not state before the court that he too was the accused. Of which he said there was no result. Recovering a knife from a single accused, the police did not mention the facts of the recovery before denying it, and he was removed from the e-ban. Or were not sent to a serologist to find out whether these individuals were stained with human blood, the rehabilitation is unknown and they cannot be used against the accused. Proof of the situation should be each other. Was connected and if any stream was missing, then the benefit should go to the accused, in the present case. There was no trial against the accused even after extra-judicial confession and evidence of recovery were dropped. Prove your case against the suspects beyond any doubt to maintain the conviction divorce advocates from Talagang lawyer