Find a Lawyer

RAFAQAT HUSSAIN versus STATE

Section 302 (b) Appreciating Evidence One of the prosecution's witnesses, who was an unmarried girl and lived in the home, was a natural witness Syed's witness punched the victim's head in order to protect the victim from her clutches. Was beaten and because of the fact medical evidence supported the Danda blow, the other prosecutor's witness was also a resident of the same street and had no enmity or any relation to the accused from any remote party. Witnesses said the witnesses remained inconsistent in cross-examination and that their statements proved credible, reliable and reliable. There is no reason why the witnesses were falsely implicated or substituted for the real witness because no case was filed for rejecting the eyewitness account and any of the tombs The speculation was ruled out because of a sudden appearance. The incident was a planned murder of the accused, which was full of poison. The victim suffered other injuries and was convinced she could not survive. Medical evidence confirmed the ocular account, on the indication of the suspect, the stained knife in the recovered blood was sent to a chemical examiner, who also expressed the opinion that the serologist, who had a blood stain. Weapons. The human blood recovery was confirmed by the prosecution, in the circumstances, the prosecutor proved in his case beyond reasonable doubt against the accused, who brutally killed his helpless woman, Who sustained a knife-wielding blow on his person, and through the trial, criminal advocate from Wan Radha Ram lawyer