Find a Lawyer

JUMMA KHAN versus SUBAY KHAN

Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 material irregularities and oral contract for the misrepresentation of evidence were the accused's brother and defendant's real brother, in the presence of the alleged oral agreement and witnesses and defendants 74,000. The payment of Rs and the rest of the sale was to be adjusted against mortgages already formed by the price adjustment agreement, it was stated that the suit was not written due to the fraternity relationship and the trial court ruled. The order was affirmed in the appeal that the defendant had, in turn, sold two acres through the Registered Sale Act, Another mortgage transaction was considered at Rs 30,000 and yet another sale transaction was made except for one suit land, no doubt, the oral contract was enforceable under the law but for that purpose. There was a need for strong evidence, especially when it was specifically denied that the oral evidence contained any contradiction with regard to the value, there was no evidence to show that the appellate court had resolved the contradictions. Tried to say that the witnesses hated the defendant, they were interested in falsely submitting to the defendant that the plaintiff claimed that the parties Three of the sales transactions between the parties were through registered sale deeds, trial and Rs. 30,000 was given against written custody and the mortgage case was executed by the claimant in the presence of such claim. I cannot accept that the entire sale price was paid without writing, why not adjust it by the claimant before the mortgage before the previous sale transaction? immigration advocates from Sanghi lawyer