Find a Lawyer

MASTER NAZEER AHMAD versus STATE

Definitions of Articles 302, 324, 337 F (v), 148 and 149 According to the medical evidence, only the complainant and the other witness of the prosecutor suffered injuries, the injuries to the complainant were caused by a fire arm. , While three others were injured in the other prosecution. The witness was due to a two-pronged weapon that the accused, who was allegedly equipped with two-handed weapons, was acquitted by the trial court's main accused and no one has any hostility against the deceased or the ex-accused. Hostility was not present between one of the accused and the complainant. Presiding over the incident, while there was no background of enmity or enmity between the complainant and the rest of the accused, the prosecution did not come up with the whole truth and gave an exaggerated account of the incident, the defense version also suppressed the truth. Faced with the statements of the investigating officers, the opinion was not that they were not witnesses to the incident of the police officer's opinion about the crime or innocence of any criminal, was irrelevant and the evidence was unreliable in the court. Had to examine the evidence presented by the parties and arrive at the correct conclusions. , In front of the CR PC, but not after that, the two sides did not come up with the real story and tried to minimize their share in the incident, but the incompleteness of the story was not properly judged by the court. Will not be able to stop the evidence from being properly blown away. And the situation was worsened when the land was raised from a plot belonging to the complainant, which caused the incident not only to be a foreshadowing attack, but also the result of sudden incident. famous lower court advocate from Diamer lawyer