Find a Lawyer

ALLAH WASAYA versus MEMBER (COLONIES) BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

A. XLVII, Rr 2 and 5 of the West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act (XI of 1957), Section 8 Power of Review Scope Second Review Application Qualification Court, authority or board member, to review your own order, decision or practice decision. Was eligible The power of its review is reviewed in R2 of the CPC, which is not the High Court, on the basis of anything other than the discovery of such new and important case or evidence as R1 of the XLVII. I am told, in view of this ruling on the existence of the CPC, that any academic or mathematical error or omission appears, such request shall be made only to the judge who passed or ordered To be reviewed, but any such request, if the decision may be passed or the order is passed by the judge, ordered to issue a notice under O XLVII, R1 sub-rule (2), Provo (A), CPC. Was, The Board of Revenue has caused him to dispose of the highest forum of strengthening revenue. F. Revenue (full board), placed before multiple members of the Board o, shall hear the second petition provided that it complies with or meets the requirements of sub-section (1) of section 8 of the West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act, 1957. If so, the final point was attached in this case after the first revision request was issued. The second or third application for review on behalf of the applicants and on the basis of which the natural justice was opposed, there was no prohibition for filing the second review application in the West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act, 1957, but to file The rules shall be the same as those referred to in Section 8 (1) and C1 of the Act XLVII, CPC, to any person who fails. pakistani advocates Rajana lawyer