MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus STATE
Section 497 of the Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 bail, denied the request for a second bail by the accused on the basis that some facts in the request for bail were not presented before the court and this court Was also not properly supported. If there was a ground available at the time of argument in the first bail application, but no arguments or arguments could be given, it could not be considered as a new field at the time of arguments in the second or subsequent bail application. This can be argued. The first bail plea cannot be offered by the lawyer discussing or not remembering, while discussing the second bail application, the effect of recovering the weapon from the accused was taken, which, in fact, The first person, the accused, was charged with a crime. The prohibition clause of section 497 also fell, PCP Bell was denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Tando Adam lawyer
