Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SARWAR versus STATE

In the Section 302 case, the FIR's evidence was immediately registered. The complainant was the son of the deceased woman at the age of 75, while the second witness of the prosecution did not belong to the victim and was the sole accused. It was unusual to be replaced, as it was not a complainant who relied on the victim's son, left his mother's real murderer, and falsely linked the accused to the victim's person. Seven were found injured, some with wounds and some with arms, which showed that different weapons had been used. . No previous rivalry was found between the parties in the incident. In the inquest report, the accused's name was disclosed and FIR numbers were also mentioned and the victim's clothes were found to have been stained with human blood, According to the Chemical Examiner's report and the serologist accused reportedly failing to prove his alibi's request, the eye witnesses were very natural and could not be denied on the spot. He was subjected to an investigation, but his testimony could not move him, prosecutors said. Had proven his case against the accused beyond any doubt to maintain the death sentence and there was nothing on record bail mitigation and the accused was sentenced to death and confirmed in connection with the murder. female advocates from Satyana Bangla lawyer