Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZIM versus STATE

Section 302 (b) of the definition of evidence was filed immediately without any mediation and advice. The complainant was the brother of the deceased and the second witness of the prosecution was the mother of the deceased, both prisoners of the house, natural witnesses. , They could not be present on the spot. Otherwise, a real mother and brother of the deceased will not leave the real culprit and will not include the innocent person. The electric bulb was shown on a site plan prepared by Patwari with turtle, the suspect was not identified in the light of the electric bulb. The ocular account presented by the natural evidence found between the ocular account and medical evidence, which had intrinsic significance, was fully verified by the medical evidence prosecution, in the circumstances beyond any veil of suspicion against the accused. Was able to prove his case but there were some mitigating circumstances available, such as the defendant's negligence of the opportunity, which was electronically set in the FIR by the defendant himself. On the same evidence, the co-accused, who was declared a firearm injury on the victim's chin, was acquitted by the trial court who eventually recovered. The suspect did not repeat the shots. And the victim was a suspect, who had three criminal cases in his credit, including a kidnapping case, in which section 302 (b), PPC, was to maintain the conviction of his The death penalty was converted to life imprisonment with the benefits of Section 222B. , CR PC, accordingly advocate from Minchanabad lawyer