MUHAMMAD SAFDAR versus STATE
Validating the provisions of Sections 302 (b), 324, 109, 148 and 149, the complainant, who died later, made the statement before his death, which was considered to be a declaration of death, two other prosecution witnesses belonging to the two accused. The weapons were cited, but no weapons were provided, the accused allegedly acquitting the trial court's accomplice, mainly because of the gun used by him at present. Was not recovered, but the trial court sentenced the accused despite the fact that there was no recovery from their possession and their weapons They were not cited in the FIR. The trial court did not give any reason as to how the case or the accused was declared distinguished from the acquitted accused, against whom no appeal was filed, Through the trial, the prosecution was not sustainable against the accused. The trial court set aside the accused and was acquitted of all charges and released.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Ubaro lawyer
