HAJI MUHAMMAD BASHIR versus STATE
On the filing of the amended complaint in Articles 200, 202 and 203 amendment complaint which included the name of the applicant and other respondents, the trial court also entertained it and ordered the issuance of summons to the newly added accused including the applicant. , Stated that the request for amendment was challenged on the basis that the complaint was not authorized and that upon receipt of a fresh / amended complaint, the trial court should have examined the complaint before proceeding. After allowing the complainant to file a modified / updated complaint, the newly amended complaint was entertained without complying with the legal formalities. Because the complainant and himself were satisfied that the applicant had sufficient material in the record to ask for the accused, the applicant was unable to find the accused, unable to manage. It was set aside and the matter was referred to the Trial to that extent. Conduct a new inquiry about the complainant with the observer to record the statement, and then ask to be sought if he or she is satisfied with the involvement of the applicant and other respondents.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Mangal Sada lawyer