Find a Lawyer

MST. MEHRUNNISA versus MUHAMMAD RASHEED KHAN

For the specific performance of the Section 12 suit for sale agreement, the plaintiff claimed that the plaintiff had entered into a sale agreement with his lawyer under which he agreed to sell the suit. The suit alleges that it did not sell or receive the suit land to the plaintiff. The same plaintiff had to prove the execution of any alleged sale agreement, but he did not provide the least evidence of that agreement and had no explanation given by him! Plaintiff's lawyer erred by the plaintiff's serious error presented by the plaintiff. The plaintiff did not pay the defendant any money, but he agreed to do so himself. Later, the defendant's attorney also testified that The defendant subsequently approached the plaintiff in contemplation of the sale, but the plaintiff failed to pay to the plaintiff, who was the brother of the defendant and did not pay due consideration, the specific performance of the trial court's dismissal. Was not entitled to arbitrary relief from the lawsuit, but the appellate court, without considering the terms of the trial, T's findings were overturned, the appellate order was not inappropriate, it was set aside and the trial court affirmed. famous high court advocate from Choppar Hatta lawyer