Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus STATE

Definition of evidence in Sections 302 (b), 324, 148 and 149. The principal accused / appellant charged with verifying the defense version of the injured eye witness, examining the scope FLR, committing the murder of the accused against eight accused and injuring the eyewitness, Was escalated and was declared deadly injury to the deceased and sentenced to death, two co-accused were sentenced to life imprisonment and five were suspected to be acquitted by the trial court. He did not disclose the purpose of appearing before the Investigation Officer or his presence in cross-examination before the trial. The FIR was not lodged, but was recorded at the scene of the incident, which led to the conviction and fabrication. The delay in conducting a post-mortem examination of the deceased resulted in the fact that the FIR was not filed at the time given in the FIR. The presence of a witness in the injured eye cannot be doubted, especially when the injured The time of the person's medical examination was at the time of the incident. The injured prosecution witness did not have any prior hostility or unlawful intent against the accused, nor was there any motive for engaging them in this case. The defendant's witness, who was injured on the defense side, was delayed in medical examination and was unable to stop the field because of his injuries, as no suggestion was made in front of Dr. Defendant in this regard. The suspect was shot in self-defense. It cannot be believed that the accused was injured and also killed. property advocates from Attock lawyer