MUHAMMAD LATIF versus FARMAN ALI THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS
The trial court dismissed the claim that the plaintiff / pre-emptor failed to prove the required student appellate court, however, contrary to the trial court testimony presented by the plaintiff. The results suspended that the plaintiff was told about the sale. The suit land by his own sister, who was also one of the shopkeepers, was not presented to the plaintiff's Syed sister as a witness and no clear explanation was given by the plaintiff for missing such material. , Despite the fact that she was a resident of the village appeals court. The above circumstances did not take notice and the trial court did not even consider the absence of an appeal decision which was based on reading / misreading material evidence, which was not sustained in law and therefore was excluded. had gone. This resulted in the restoration of the order passed by the trial court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Samma Satta lawyer
