Find a Lawyer

KHURRAM ZEESHAN versus ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, POLICE STATION ANTI-NARCOTICS FORCE, FAISALABAD

Sections 9 (c) and 15 Drug Act (XXXI of 1976), Section 7 Drugs (Licensing, Registry and Advertising) Rules, 1976, Roll 8 Punjab Drug Rules, 1988, RR 2 (E), 15 (iii), 17 (2)) ()), ?? (i) (B&C) and Schedule B Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Drugs / drugs were recovered from the possession of psychiatric drugs / medicines by the accused while In filing an FIR, he held that he had dealt with the sale and sale of pharmaceutical drugs / drugs under a license issued by a competent authority. That the drugs recovered from his custody were produced by a manufacturer's holding license, which was created by the competent authority under the Drugs Act 1976. The accused was authorized to sell drugs exported to Nos. 10 and 11 issued by the licensing authority under Punjab Drug Rules 1988, which was licensed to sell drugs and other controlled medicines to the accused who was on the schedule of Punjab Drug Rules 1988. Was assigned to B. Punjab Drugs Rules 1988, read with Rules 2 (e), 15 (II) and 21 (i) (B&C), do not reflect the drugs sold under drug paraphernalia under Form 10 and Umbrella. Do The Punjab Drug Rules, 1988, included in the Schedule of Control of Drug Substances Act 1997, the drug was recovered from the accused who did not enjoy any protection from the law, hence, established under Section 9 (c) of the said Act The constitutional request made was dismissed accordingly. immigration advocates email from Kazi Ahmed lawyer