TARIQ JAVED versus MST. TAHIRA BIBI
Section 5, Schedule 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application suit for restitution and recovery of dowry articles, being the father of the petitioner minor, was obliged to maintain minor restitution amount for minor. In the circumstances of the case, the appellate court was rightly raised from Rs. PM PM to Rs. 1000 PM PM as per the evidence presented by the parties, which required any interference in the articles of dowry. No, the appellate court considered and considered the dowry list. After considering the evidence headed by the parties, the appellate court increased the amount unannounced, the facts of the case could not be investigated and the evidence could not be re-examined in the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court. Cannot exercise jurisdiction illegal or illegal. Applicant pointed out, invalid decision in the absence of any weakness or illegal process in the unknown decision, dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Depal Pur lawyer