Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus QUTBA

Section 3, 13 and 24 for the pre-arrest of the case 1 / 3rd amount of deposit (gold deposit) The plaintiff, on the day this case was filed, was directed by the trial court to give 1 / of the total value of the sale. Make a deposit within the 3rd amount. The case was filed on 10 8 2004, one month (30 days) from the date of the order and the plaintiff submitted the ZARIM on 10 9 2004. The suit was dismissed on the basis that Zara EIM was granted 30 days. Appeal trial court's decision against the period submitted was more than (fixed period). There was a 30-day period to calculate. As soon as he has settled the case in court and the current sale of the proceeds of the sale, the 30-day period begins to enter the suit court, on 8 8 8 8 on on, the plaintiff was instructed to sell Submit one / third of the amount. Within 30 days whose expiration date in 8 9 2004, the period of the plaintiff was expired 1 day after the expiry of the fixed period of 30 days the extension of time for the third deposit was limited to 30 days. Gone and the court cannot extend this provision for the first time at discretion 24 under the Punjab Pre-emption Act 1991. Extending the court more than 30 days by a positive command in the negative If the expiry of the day before the deposit is made by the plaintiff, it can neither be extended nor given any benefit to the plaintiff. It may be that the amount of 1 / 3rd is compulsory in nature, neither the directory nor the plaintiff must submit the same amount within 30 days after the appeal against the judgment of the appellate court was dismissed. list of supreme court advocates from Khurian wala lawyer