Find a Lawyer

ARIF KHAN versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, KABIRWALA DISTRICT KHANEWAL

Sections 154, 22A & 161 Police Rules, 1934, RR 24 1 (1) and 24 3 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 380 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application in the presence of the first The second FIR was registered against the accused who committed the murder of the police constable under sections 23080 and 808080, a month after which the FIR's father filed an FIR. Under R, the petition was filed before the Sessions Court, which filed against the petitioner, four co-accused and the accused constable. Committed the misconduct with his son (the accused) after which his son committed the murder of the deceased and petitioner and co-accused prayed for the FIR to be registered against the court and the second of the same incident. An order for FIR registration was approved. According to the correct version of the Court of Session constitutional application, as the defendant (father) had stated in his petition before the Court of Session, in respect of the pre-filed FIR, which was to come later only in Section 161, C.R.P. The police rule under C was to be omitted as described under Rule 24 1 (2) of 1934, the first information report to be registered as the officer-in-charge of the police station upon receipt of the notification and the same was to be recorded in the station diary but the police rules. Under Rule 24 3 of the 1934 Act, information on an unrecognized crime could only be recorded in the station diary. In the form of a cross-version, the respondents disclosed the unrecognizable offense, as it should be considered as a statement under Section 161, the CRPC stated in the respondent's statement that his son The murder of the deceased when you need a advocate from Naudero lawyer