Find a Lawyer

EJAZ AHMED versus JUDGE, FAMILY COURT

Section 5, Schedule, Sections 14 and 17 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition for raising the amount of care parties, under which each child was awarded Rs. 600 as monthly maintenance. Year after year, the juvenile filed a second case to recover the restitution amount, which was raised by Rs 2,000 per month for each of the three minor children, as the father challenged the constitutional petition. And the father has said that the second case of rehabilitation allowance is not applicable in view of the provision of Section 11, CPC and Rs. 2,000 per child per month for three children. This is a maintenance allowance. The West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, to file a second case for the increase of restitution allowance, except under section 11, CPC, which was applicable to these proceedings under section 17, Above all else, but above all its legitimacy. West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964. Under this clause, the second case will be prevented only if the case is proceeding directly or substantially between the parties in a previous case, without doubt, in the present case, no doubt. The case was for rehabilitation, but there was an issue with the increase. Neither was raised or considered in this case, nor in the case of section 11 of CPC, nor will there be any subsequent lawsuit that will only increase the restoration allowance. The second lawsuit that was filed was sustained in view of the inflation rate and the inefficiency, in addition to the rising demand for minors, which was set for 20 list of supreme court advocates from FR Peshawar / Kohat lawyer