Find a Lawyer

WASEEM IQBAL versus ADDITIONAL INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, INVESTIGATION BRANCH, PUNJAB, LAHORE

Article 18 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of the Maintenance Transfer of Investigation The applicant was declared innocent on the first inquiry, but on the complainant's request the inquiry was changed and after investigation the new The Investigation Officer declared the applicant an accused. Under Article 18 (2) of the Police Order, 2002, the petition was filed by the editor for the second modification of the inquiry, which was not allowed by the Additional Inspector General of Police; the applicant filed a constitutional petition, retaining the Constitution. The jurisdiction was arbitrary and the High Court was not obliged to interfere with it. Each case is based solely on the desire for an alternative action against the proceedings in the constitutional petition, unless there are compelling reasons which indicate that non-interference will either lead to injustice or to retain unlawful gain. Only money will be supported for. The purpose of the change in the culprit investigation was that the applicant was found guilty in the second inquiry and the applicant wanted to present a second opinion The applicant's opinion had no legal sanction and the second opinion by the investigating officer was referred to the High Court. Could not be the basis for doing so. The role of the investigator, neither the investigator can be controlled by interfering with the constitutional petition, was dismissed, in the circumstances. criminal advocate from Dera Bugti lawyer