Find a Lawyer

LUQMAN ZAREEN AND OTHERS versus SECRETARY EDUCATION, N.-W.F.P.

Section 8 Promotion Acting Charge Promotion Date Determined Government employees were promoted on the basis of Acting Charge on 31 acting 2000 but the Departmental Promotion Committee issued a notification to Government Employees on their complaint on 27 5 2003 that at that time Their progress was not considered. He was promoted on the basis of a charge of development which was told to the civil servant to hold a high position after which he was regularly promoted, until that time he was entitled to the salary associated with the post. ? Besides, there are other benefits that can be associated with such a position if there is a vacancy in the higher cadre in which a government employee was eligible to be promoted permanently but on the basis of which By mistake he was not given so much progress and instead put on. On the basis of employment in such position, then on the regular development of such position, the public servant shall be deemed to have advanced so far as the date from which he has been allowed to hold the higher office. Justification reasons do not exist unless the Supreme Court reverses the leave application in the appeal and sets aside the decision passed by the service tribunal, the Supreme Court deemed government employees. 31 8 was promulgated from 2000 and not allowed to appeal from 27 5 2003 tax advocates from Theing Jattan More lawyer