Find a Lawyer

DR. NOSHEEN QAMAR versus SHAH ZAMAN KHATTAK

Article 5 Muslim Marriage Act (VIII of 1939), Section 2 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), O XLI, R 22 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Repression of divorce and cruelty proceedings The appeal for non-objection was granted by the Supreme Court for leave. Although Family Court's finding that the cruelty case did not prove was not in accordance with the Family Court's evidence and reasoning. Can it not be said in the circumstances of the case that the family court did not dissolve the marriage on the basis of khula: did the High Court not err in the law by observing that the wife challenged the findings regarding the case of oppression? Because the decree was in favor of what she could do under the OLLI, the R22 CPC also defended it on the basis of its decision. Is it a rule that if the wife has been compelled to divorce her husband by ill-treatment, it is illegal for her to get paid and if the man compels the woman to accept the divorce, then no divorce will be paid for it. Without any restrictions. In case of marriage dissolution on Khulna's land, the husband did not have the benefit of restoring the husband. Whether in the absence of specific demand from the husband or in the event of a waiver of a cash allowance of Rs. 200,000, the High Court may reimburse the husband. Whether the law that the High Court had set in the cases relating to Mukhtar Ahmed v. Omar Kalsoom and another, according to PLD 1975 L805 and Noor Muhammad v. Judge, Family Court Burewala, District Vehari and another. PLD 1989 was reported as la 31. Right famous supreme court advocate from Utror lawyer