FAIZUM ALIAS TOOR versus NANDER KHAN
Article 12 (2) and OVI, R4 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 18 and Article 181 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) decree, agreeing to the extension of the charge on the extension of the limit The decree of opinion was adopted on 30 3. 1971 and the petition was filed under section 12 (2) of the CPC, in which the applicant applied for extension of the limit under the Limitation Act 1908 Trial Court to revoke the judgment on the basis of fraud and At the same time the lower appellate court had dismissed it simultaneously. The petition and such order was upheld by the High Court Plea that it was raised by the applicants that the filing deadline would start from the date of the discovery of the fraud. The non-disputed limit for application under section 12 (2) was implemented under Article 181 of the CPC Limitation Act, 1908. Who was three years old and wanted to extend the limit under Section 18 of the Applicants' Limitation Act, 1908, on the basis of fraud, details were required under O VI, R 4 CPC. In order to overcome the limitation but not given in the petition, the Supreme Court did not find anything weak or illegal in the High Court order.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Mir Ali lawyer