Find a Lawyer

HIDAYATULLAH AND OTHERS versus THE STATE THROUGH ADVOCATE-GENERAL, N.-W.F.P. PESHAWAR HIGH COURT, PESHAWAR

Sections 419, 420, 468 and 471 of the Corruption Prevention Act (Second of 1947), Section 5 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Sections 63, 195 (1) (c), 435, 439 and 561 The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the hereditary jurisdiction of the Constitution, the magistrate's exercise of discretion of the accused by the magistrate principals was terminated under Section 63 CCP on the basis that the alleged fake documents were also. Is a matter of civil suit. Is pending before the civil court and no complaint was filed by the court. The relevant order was passed by the Magistrate, which was applied by the lower appellate court, but the High Court, in exercising its powers under Section 6161A, rejected the CRPC's order that the relevant legality magistrate. There was discretion to approve the order under. Section Cr Cr CCP should be used fairly and fairly by the relevant magistrate to relieve the accused. Without the use of an open mind on the facts of the case, the order of discharge by the magistrate was approved, in this case the recommended blindfold approval of the police, the error of reasoning and the adoption of the procedure that was followed by the letter and the law. Angry against the soul. In order to discharge, then the High Court had sufficient jurisdiction to intervene and to establish such order under Section 6161 and A, CRPC Magistrate while agreeing on the police report submitted under section 737373. In doing so, the CRP session did not act as a criminal court under the sessions and High Court courts. Such order of the Magistrate cannot be set aside under the provisions of section 3535 and Cr 439, CRPC. top civil advocates from Kotmomin lawyer