MUHAMMAD AFZAAL versus STATE
Section 9 (b) Cage of Evidence accused Initially, the reduction of sentence in the Council for the accused did not choose to challenge the accused's conviction, but merely sought reduction of the sentence because the accused was not a previous offender. Who were alleged to have suffered a significant portion. In another case of similar nature, his conviction for showing the previous involvement of the accused and nothing else was on record. The conviction was reduced to 3 years \ RI was reduced to 2 years RI, however It was retained \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Dhirkot lawyer
