Find a Lawyer

GHULAM YASIN versus STATE

Section 302 (b) definition of evidence, reduction of conviction cases was immediately lodged with the FIR even though the deceased's father was, but he had no animosity or any motive for the case. This was a rare occurrence, despite being falsely involved. A real father of the deceased will replace the perpetrator of the case. The complainant had adequately described his presence at the scene of the incident and his presence at the place of his presence was quite natural and there was no reason to accept his statement. The complainant was subjected to a lengthy crossing. The prosecution witness was also consistent with all the material details of the case and could not refrain from anything and nothing was lightened by his testimony. Despite his cross-examination, the testimony under which he was targeted during the trial. He had reasonably proved his presence at the scene that he witnessed the incident and the evidence was credible. From the medical evidence, the ocular account was fully confirmed, along with the evidence of the recovery of the weapons of the crime and the eviction of the crime, as well as the report of the fire expert who was positively charged. However, he was also injured in the case, but he was told that no question was raised about his suffering and it could not be said, in cases where the injury was either self-inflicted or The issue of someone else's or someone else's case suddenly flared up, the fact of the injury and the pressure of speaking through the act of the accused was the fact that he did not do it again and fired only one. Which proved fatal, immigration advocates from Mohen Jo Daro lawyer