Find a Lawyer

KHALID FAROOQ versus STATE

Definition of Section 2?2 (b) and proof of evidence was communicated to the police through the complainant who informed the police, who was resident of the same area, who explained his presence on the occasion of the prosecution witness, who was also resident. ? The location also described his presence at the scene, both of whom said the witnesses were subjected to a lengthy investigation, contradicting the statements of the two witnesses regarding the presence of two witnesses at the scene. The matter was not on record as the presence of the witnesses may have been intended to be minor in the cross-examination by the defense system, but the slight contradictions in his statements regarding the making of the firearm were not sufficient to warrant the involvement of the accused. Was not enough to discredit his version of because he was the only suspect who allegedly made 1 2 were shot while beating an armed suspect with a bore pistol. His right foot, near his knee injury, has been charged by both witnesses, which agrees with medical evidence. Both the prosecution's witnesses and the complainant had fully proved the case against the accused. In fact, there was some previous rivalry between the accused parties and after the legal proceedings against it, the prosecution was able to prove the murder of the murderer Um. And the conviction of the accused under section 2302 (b) could not be altered solely on the basis that it had inflicted injury on an unimportant part of the deceased's body and that each case had to be decided on its own merits. There was nothing on the record to suggest. He is not accused of killing the accused property advocate from Shamsabad lawyer