Find a Lawyer

FAZAL WADOOD versus STATE

Article 2 (b) and un 324 law marriages (1984), Article Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Repeated arrest of the evidence Judicial confession was withdrawn, in some courts to remain absconding The final outcome of the offense recorded by the courts below was the time the accused confessed to the prosecution after his arrest when the trial court sentenced him and sentenced him to death, which was affirmed by the High Court Player that the accused He never committed a confession, both the courts found that the confession was registered by a criminal officer who was recording a confessional statement. Good negotiation with the legal requirements for Annexure, which has no basis in the Judicial Officer's statement to look into the confessional statement with any doubt, the prosecutor established his case by merely presenting solid and convincing evidence. Punishment can be made on the basis of confession. If his statement was alleged under Article 342 CCPC without compromise, he did everything for example, whether his confession was false or he was subjected to mental pressure, threat, hardship or greed. Was brought, it may be that the confession would prove to be a crime, in the present case the magistrate refused to make a confessional statement, which suggests that the judicial officer had committed fraud. The record; even though it was not suggested to the magistrate, who recorded the confession as the accused was clearly lying, thus the confession did not abate with the crime and to stand on his own to maintain the death penalty. The magistrate voluntarily recorded the confession of the accused who testified. Confessed property advocate from Mardan lawyer