Find a Lawyer

TASSADUQUE HUSSAIN ALIAS SHAIKH versus STATE

Section 302, 324 and 34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (a) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), sections 342 and 364 are punishable by conviction under section 2302 (b) and The accused / appellants were sentenced to death, the PPC read with Section (a) Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. Each of the accused was assigned a role in the commission of the crime, even in the evidence recorded by the court. This has clearly come to light. As a result, the accused were unable to prepare their defense according to the specific allegations leveled against them. The purpose of Kuwait was to record the accused's statement under section 2342, CC Percy had to inform him of the prosecution's case so that he would be able to explain any circumstances arising out of the evidence against him, and prepare himself in his defense accordingly in the form of questions and answers. Had to be recorded in section 646464, CR PC, the English language and if the accused did not understand the English language then he would have to explain it then the language statement he could understand. And the accused was to be signed by both and a certificate was to be added by the judge which stated that in the statement Mills under section 342 The same is true and true account of the statements made by the appellant. That each of the accused was asked the same question to which he gave the same answer, although according to the evidence this record is recorded each of the accused was charged separately for the crime neither statement nor statement. The certificate itself was signed by the judge so it was subjected to discrimination and they were unable to explain their facts and immigration advocates email from Dera Ismail Khan lawyer