Find a Lawyer

CH. ASAD BILAL versus MUHAMMAD HANIF

Sections 12 (2), 24, 151, 152 and 153 put aside the preceding party decree and the correction of error / error in the decree and the transfer of proceedings from one court to another in the two plaintiffs / defendants. Former parties against applicants were dismissed. Two sets of petitions before the trial court. To set aside the prior judgments / decrees under section 12 (2), CPC; and second, to amend the said decisions and orders passed by the trial court under Sections 151, 152 and 153; The defendants of the PC filed separate petitions before the District Court for the transfer of the aforesaid under Section 24, CPC. In the same district court, the transfer requests to another court were dismissed on the basis that only the court, which passed the verdict and orders, had the same authority under section 152, CPC, in the decisions of the learned or mathematical. Has the power to reject error and to correct it. Or any order or omission found in it by accident slip or deficiency at any time by the court either on its own motion or at the request of a party to any matter passed to section 24, CPC, the District Court and the High Court. There are options. , Appeals or other proceedings before and subject to the trial of another court and are subordinate to and subject to the same court, which passed the judgment and decree, pursuant to section 12 ( 2) was to be set aside under CPC and any application under section 152, CPC for correction of any math or grammatical error in such decision and order advocate for immigration from Moro lawyer