NAZEER AHMED ALIAS MALANG THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES versus MAQSOOD AHMED
For the specific performance of the contractual plaintiff in the Section 12 suit, the suit stated that it had purchased the suit land for consideration by the defendant, paid some amount for the outstanding balance, and the execution of the registered sale deed on the due date. Time was to balance. Failure to execute the registered sale deed in terms of the sale agreement, the plaintiff sued the defendant denied the execution of the contract, alleging that the sale agreement was fraudulent and inaccurate and that neither plaintiff had Has not received any sale money from nor has it occupied the suit land. Legislative slot order was evidence presented by the plaintiff with regard to the sale agreement as well as the possession, restoring the trust did not succeed in keeping the counsel's counsel under section 100 within the plaintiffs, CPC plaintiff. Was able to prove that the sale was a contract, mutual payment was made pursuant to that agreement and that it had a suit landowner concurrently on the decisions and orders of the two courts below, the second appeal did not interfere. Can go
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from FR DI Khan lawyer