ASMAT versus STATE
Section 497 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 6 and 7 Explosives Act (VI of 1908), Sections 3 and 4 guaranteed, it was shown that the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction of doubtful jurisdiction was shown. The statements of the prosecution witnesses were not listed on the date. The incident and the police were not aware of the names of the culprits Three prosecution witnesses did not involve a particular person in the commission of the crime or only the person accused of the commission of the crime or someone involved in other cases, to prevent bail. It was not enough, each case had to consider its own merits. The accused was entitled to doubt even at the bail stage. The facts and circumstances of the police file were such that the accused appeared to be entitled to be released on bail, The bail was granted to the accused, under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Samma Satta lawyer