Sections 13 and 6 of the testimony of the law (10 of 1984), a woman testifying in the article 3 prior notice of the testimony testified by the witnesses, the son of the former MP, whose presence in the case presented the credibility of the woman There were natural witnesses of the occasion, who did not ask for a housewife to learn about the sale, to witness the toll or to declare it in front of others, said witnesses' statements Says his testimony was not disputed. The notice of the students had gone abroad and yet they were not examined, the following courts were convinced by reliable evidence that the divorce was proved in accordance with the law, twenty one The pre-emptive right of ownership was established by Whether or not the evidence was misread, illegal or poorly designed to interfere with the facts or the legal or valid jurisdiction. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2006
