Find a Lawyer

JAMIL AHMED versus STATE

The testimony of section 302 (b) was not a direct testimony of the case and the prosecutor relied on the evidence to prove his case. Had confessed to a confession that had not been presented. As a complainant during the trial, when the prosecutor's witness made a dishonest improvement in his statement to the trial court of the confessional statement of the accused confessing before himself and other prosecutor's witnesses, In the light of his statement, a statement of his statement and a fragment of his piece should be found. Extra judicial confession by the prosecution witnesses cannot be separated from the matters related to the crime, the truth of their statements was seriously hurt and the confession story was presented. The prosecution's witnesses could rely on the confession through medical evidence. Is. If it was made voluntarily and without greed or the alleged confession was made to more than three people in the promise, but none of them arrested the accused and presented it to the police. What, in such cases, could the statement of the prosecution's witnesses, who was in serious suspicion, confess to the accused before them? It cannot be relied on the fact that the deceased and the accused were seen only by the relevant witnesses, not by other residents of the area, which was a serious obstacle to the story of the prosecution, hence the recovery of blood of the stabbed knife and purse with ID card. No evidence could be relied upon. She died from her home immigration advocates email from Jamshoro lawyer