Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD LATIF versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL, KHANEWAL

Sections 42 and 54 of the Punjab Local Government Election Rules, 2005, RR 65 and 76 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Selection Controversy Appeal for Determination of Civil Court Jurisdiction Candidate Announces His Matric Certificate and Board Before the Intermediate and Secondary Education of the Dispensary Committee of the Dispensary Committee, the Civil Court of a Civil Court issued the interim injunction and on the basis of the same order, the petitioner demanded that the application be stopped in the election. The tribunal had refused to stop the proceedings, petitioner P.K. That the civil court was a full jurisdictional court, its ruling was binding on the accuracy of the election tribunal. The petitioner filed a civil case before the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education Dispensary Committee, without implementing the election tribunal. The court's interim order was issued with the exception that the Matrix applicant's attestation certificate would not be revoked illegally, however, this order did not apply to any proceedings until the civil court had submitted the matter before the election tribunal. It was not considered appropriate to stop the pending action, which was an independent action Bonal had exclusive jurisdiction to determine eligibility, using such scope of a candidate to contest the election under R76 (1) (b) of the Punjab Local Government Election Rules 2005, the tribunal had Was trying to sue under the Civil Procedure Code, 1908. Order passed by the Election Tribunal, without any illegal action or harmless law firms from Jehanian lawyer