Find a Lawyer

MST. SAKINA BIBI versus KHURSHID ALI

The plaintiff for the Section 42 declaration was the owner of the suit property and another person obtained the mutation under which the defendant sold the suit to the plaintiff. The case against the defendant on the alleged sale of the controversial mutation, which was pronounced ex parte against the plaintiff plaintiff, who was a deaf and dumb woman, was never served and is fully proved. It is likely that the plaintiff and the other person were deprived of the conspiracy, after considering the evidence, their evidence before the trial court in the trial court, the case was dismissed on the basis of the findings filed by the Additional Commissioner, but the appellant. Court dismisses lawsuit for pre-discrimination Lee was in Bhagat. The dispute over the alleged sale of the suit land to each other was not proven; if she was forced to go through the second round of litigation, she would commit illegal labor on the defendant. The appellate order, which proceeded on the assumption that defendant was served, was set aside and the High Court affirmed the trial court's decision. law websites from Daharki lawyer