Sections 173 and 200 of the Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), section 302/337 J / 34 Qatl e amd, were hurt by a poison; the private complaint should be dismissed on the basis of unconfirmed summary evidence from the joint intention of the accused. The legal claim (against him) was that he had poisoned the victim (the complainant's brother). Police found the accused innocent during the interrogation and proposed a cancellation case, after which to record summary evidence. The complainant was forced to file a private complaint trial court. The complainant dismissed his personal complaint without summoning the accused on the basis that based on summary evidence, there would be no possibility of conviction. After recording the evidence of the complainant legally, the trial court did not spare the option to exclude the private complaint. That the accused is unlikely to be prosecuted because such an exercise could be processed through a copy rt The trial court then ruled upon the defendants' plea based on unconfirmed summary evidence, therefore, It said that the verdict does not have any sanction of the law; such jurisdiction by the court can be termed an illegal act because the request for review was allowed, the trial court put aside the controversial order. And the court was directed to prosecute the complaint and proceedings in the challan case till the decision of the complaint case. Give it a break \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
