M. SALEEM & COMPANY versus ASKARI COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED
The suit for the recovery of Articles 10 and 22 was decided, and the defense's leave was denied, on the ground that the defendant had benefited from the financing facility for the Letter of Credit and there was a contradiction in it. Was not identified and the amount of the justification obtained by the defendant was in accordance with the contract and the amount related to the period which was not under the agreement of the Treasury for the Letter of Credit, it showed that the markup The column was empty, the defendant submitted a margin for each letter of credit but the amount of the margin was the credit in the appellant's liability account. It is shown that the signatures were on the Letter of Credit and other letters depending on which case in the first trial, the High Court set aside the trial court's order and remanded the trial with the trial court. Under the circumstances, the defendant was allowed to be discharged to defend the appeal
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
