Section 7 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 (b) / 324/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), alleges a response to evidence related to the firearms expert's complaint regarding the retrieval of the weapons of the accused. Was left unavailable. In the house where the alleged incident took place, the complainant's residence was 15 acres away from the scene. For the first time, when the complainant was examined, he stated in his statement about the prosecution and sentencing. I didn't mention anything. Death under Section 2 by2 (b), PPC by the trial court but the High Court set aside the sentence and acquitted the accused by the complainant, who was acquitted of the accused in the dark of night. The weapon was recovered and no light was available on it. It is strange and strange that the accused were based in the same village, but neither can be identified nor their names can be mentioned in the complainant's first statement that the attack can be concluded. The attackers were not identified by the firearms when no information was received by the fire expert, the fact of the matter had no significant effect on the merits of the case, as the firearms specialist was cleared Could not be sent to. The High Court verdict was neither objectionable nor disagreeable, but on the other hand a strong argument was given to keep the trial court's commitment aside. The High Court's decision could not identify any illegal interference against which the appeal was denied.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
