SAEED IQBAL versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY EDUCATION, LAHORE
Section 5 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3), the applicant had suspended the decree passed by the service tribunal under which his miscellaneous application was dismissed against the employment dismissal order. , Was to consider the Tribunal's first decision. The petitioner had earlier submitted that there was fraud and misappropriation of the service tribunal by dismissing the appeal against his dismissal order and that the tribunal had jurisdiction under section 12 (2), Recall his previous order that the applicant had no jurisdiction to prosecute, since the order to dismiss the applicant's appeal showed that there was no fraud or misrepresentation on the tribunal. Secondly, the miscellaneous application was not moved under section 12 (2), the appeal for appeal without the CPC petition was dismissed, in the circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Jampur lawyer
