Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD EHSAN versus STATE

Section 2 302 (b) Disposal of evidence Related witness statement of the lonely witness, the accused's son's statement was found guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment and the sentence was upheld by the High Court. By Pliya had proved that the deceased widow could be a woman's proof. He will not be trusted because he was an interested witness concerning the deceased. The fact that the deceased was the widow of the deceased would not automatically be sufficient to suggest that she is an interesting witness to consider the fact that there is no enmity with her accused or the co-accused. The enmity with the accused can have no serious effect on the credibility and credibility of the widow's testimony. The widow can easily be assigned or awarded the second injury to one of the co-accused, but he or she may have been acquitted by one of the acquitted defendants. No one was ever convicted or charged. Even if the testimony of a sole witness, if found to be reliable, trustworthy, and unforgivable, it was not necessary that in each case more than one witness should be for the purpose of conviction. Not the quantity of evidence but the quality of the evidence on which the conviction was to be based, any misrepresentation or the unnecessary. The verdict was found in which evidence or evidence of legal weakness, appeal was dismissed famous supreme court advocate from Dera Murad Jamali lawyer