Find a Lawyer

JAMIL ALIAS SABU versus STATE

Sections 302, 148 and 149 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the evidence were used to corroborate the testimony of eyewitnesses regarding the imprisonment and to influence the accused / appellant against the accused. Together they committed murder. Due to a property dispute, two persons were convicted by the trial court under section 2302 (b), PPC on two provisions and sentenced to life imprisonment and seven associate accused were acquitted. Maintained the trial court's finding. The witnesses of the incident were closely related to the deceased and as an interested witness, their testimony needs to be verified. The legality of the incident took place in a plot adjacent to the complainant's father, the deceased's father, who died before the trial began, although eye witnesses were closely related. But his presence was natural on the occasion that the accused opened the attack by shooting in December. The ease is easy and his direct aim was to launch the attack. There was a case that a previous FIR suspect was lodged against the complainant even though he died before the trial started, but the testimony of two witnesses who were closely related. Late's conviction was impressive and consistent with the prosecutor's case. The ocular testimony was proved by the medical evidence and was not intended to interfere with the intervention obtained by the High Court. top civil advocates from Hasilpur lawyer