Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus STATE

Section 2 302 (b) Definition of Evidence Both the Complainant and the Prosecutor's Witness were deeply concerned that the defendant was the natural witness to the alleged incident of the victim's brother as he lived with the victim in the same house where the incident occurred. came. The case was filed with great urgency and the FIR suspect in the aforementioned named the main accused, who was cut off with responsibility for causing solitary and fatal fireworks, cannot be believed. It is in this short period that the complainant made a conspiracy and cooked up a false story and wrongly involved his first cousin brother in the murder of the complainant's real brother's FIR. The site plan and both witnesses revealed that a light bulb was operating at the time and place of the incident, it is quite credible that even in the absence of electric light, the complainant would wake up on the spot. After being a good witness in identifying the suspect as a natural witness to the incident, it was hard to believe that he would replace his brother's real murderer and falsely prosecute his first deceased brother. Was compiled by the complainant, who assisted with the complainant's sole account. Medical evidence was assisted by the complainant's account as to the date, and at the time of the incident, the use of the weapon and all the statements made by the complainant regarding the place of injury were verified by the medical evidence and Neither was proven that he committed the murder of the deceased. Criminal conviction and sentence by the trial court advocate from Ahmadpur East lawyer