Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus D.P.O., LODHRAN

Article 18 (6) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 337A (ii), 365 and 34 of the Law Reform Ordinance (X11 of 1972), Section 3 intra-court appeals the district police officer to investigate the appeal. Transferred the inquiry by the District Police Officer, who investigated the Deputy Superintendent of Police, who, without hearing the petitioner / complainant, started investigating the case and declared the applicant / accused innocent. Was challenged before the High Court in the constitutional petition, but the Single Judge High Court rejected the constitutional request / petitioner / complainant filed a police order. An infra-court appeal against the decision of Article 18 (6) of the 2002 Single Judge was dealt with by the change of investigation and the district police officer did not find the procedure outlined in Article 18 (6). ? ) In the disturbance for the transfer of the Inquiry Board constituted under Article 18 (6) of the Police Order 2002, which did not recommend the transfer of investment, the Investigation District Police Officer could not be changed. Had exceeded his powers by ordering that the law officer's argument that since the investigating officer had completed the investigation no action should be taken, public officials were required to act lawfully. According to the law strictly the district police officer worked beyond his authority in the transfer of the investigation because he had no authority to do so, but a single High Court judge ignored the case, stating that The infra-court appeal was accepted and the single judge's order was revoked. Return to Investigation Officer tax advocates from Panjgur lawyer