Find a Lawyer

NASIR versus STATE

Section 302 conviction of testimony, reduction of both the complainant and other prosecution witnesses, who were closely related to the accused, was witness to the occasion, the location of the incident was reported two acres away from the village population while the complainant's ax The incident was a long way off and was not shown anywhere in the site site plan of the incident, claiming that witnesses testifying about their presence in the adjoining areas had been proved to be a false FIR in the police station. Was made and in such a situation it was more likely that the FIR was filed after consideration by the complaining party. Old, and police had had no obvious reason to suspect that the murder was a case of prosecution told the deceased that at the preliminary investigation stage of the case law established under the motto of the case. The circumstances, far from being established, no mutual aid in the ocular account was coming from the recovery of the 12 boo from the possession of the accused, legally unforgettable as no crime was recovered from the scene of the incident. The recovered gun could be linked to the alleged murder, saying there was no significant value in the circumstances, contradictory medical evidence and eye witnesses were defamed. The victim's body was examined with considerable delay. And said that the delay was not encountered by Dr. I if the medical evidence was triggered and recovered or came from support. Remember that if the prosecution had failed to achieve autonomy should be considered failed to establish its case, the defense of the right version of the incident, the suspect fired only once a top advocates from Rahimyar Khan lawyer