FAQIR MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD BASHIR
Sections 151 and 115 of the default rehabilitation revocation lawyer's negligence / case were adjourned twice in the year 2001, three times in 2002 in the case of justice, on the request of the applicants that their The lawyer remains abroad, the suit is dismissed. As of 2004, there was no reasonable scope for the lawyer's negligence suit to be restored as a legal request for rehabilitation. The applicants were obliged to pursue their case. The case file contained the powers of the lawyers of the two lawyers or no lawyer had applied for the cancellation of the lawyer's authority. A restitution request for his dismissal from the case was dismissed under circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Barbar Loi lawyer
