Find a Lawyer

ALLAH RAKHA ALIAS RAKHI versus STATE

The provisions of Sections 302 (b) and 337U, the date of the testimony, the place of time and the incident, were not disputed and the inquest's death was not questioned in any way; the accused also admitted that the prosecution. The witness's son, who was the victim's son, also arrived at the scene, but after the death of his late father, the accused did not appear in the witness box to refute the charges against him, nor did he support his case. Some evidence was presented, while the prosecution's story remains the testimony of a permanent prosecutor, though that has happened. The victim's son, however, had to give a permanent account of the incident when the witness's suspect suffered injuries to his face, the presence of the witness on the spot could not be disputed in any way, the prosecution's second witness was also a resident. The area, which was also cutting fodder at the relevant time of the incident, was the most free and true when witnessing the incident. Another of the prosecution's witnesses had no direct connection with the defendant nor had any reason to make false allegations against the accused, statements of the prosecution witnesses, fully supported by the help of medical evidence. The trial court concluded that the prosecution's case was beyond any doubt and that there was no reason to take any exception, that the accused, who deliberately committed the murder of the deceased, was put to death. The conviction was upheld and the trial court had no reason to uphold the conviction and sentence. Sentence confirmed jobs for advocates from More kunda lawyer