Find a Lawyer

SHAHIDA PERVEEN versus SHER AFZAL

Section 5, Schedule 9, 14 and 18 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for rehabilitation The suit filed by the lawyer was filed for rehabilitation by the lawyer, being abroad. , They could not appear in court. The Family Court acted in favor of the applicant and against the defendant to pass the former party decree; the former party directory was set aside by his lawyer for filing a petition to establish the former party directory. And the trial was ordered to re-judge the respondents in the new proceedings. Through his special counsel, the applicant filed a petition in which the respondents did not appear in person under Section 9 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, under which they had to appear in person and submit their application. The written statement was to be entered with the signatures. The Family Court proceeded to hold the case where the written statement was filed by the lawyer, but was not refused to be considered and without the hearing of the defendant, written by the defendant through his special counsel. The statement was rejected and the appellate court reversed the trial court's disclosures that the petitioner filed the case as "unreasonable". I set aside the verdict and the Family Court decision correctly, nappies approved by the appellate court Brazenly decided, was not illegal under the law, but respondents was based on the principles of natural justice, vol. top advocate from Chunian lawyer