MST. MISBAH SADDIQUE versus S.H.O.
In the petition for the custody of the section 491 minor respondents it was claimed that the mother of the applicant / minor girl who had not entered into a prohibited marriage contract with the person, had lost her right, the woman was the minor. Was in custody of his mother's mother, that if he had lost his right to marital agreement by marrying someone outside the prohibited degree, the right of childbirth was automatically transferred to the maternal mother, In such cases, the question of preference between the maternal and grandmother regarding the custody of the female minor cannot be resolved in the summary proceedings. However, since the welfare of the minor was the main idea, evidence was needed, the petition was dealt with on that occasion and the question regarding the determination of the right to detain the minor was also dealt with. Was. Two grandmothers were released by the Guardian Judge on bail \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Sohawa District Daska lawyer